Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
The Journal of Engineering and Interdisciplinary Research is enthusiastic to following best practices on ethical matters, errors and retractions. The prevention of publication malpractice is one of the important responsibilities of the editorial board. Any kind of unethical behavior is not acceptable, and the Journal of Engineering and Interdisciplinary Research does not tolerate plagiarism in any form.
The following duties outlined for editors, authors, and reviewers are based on the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors. Editors, authors, and reviewers will also stick on to the Journal of Engineering and Interdisciplinary Research Policies.
Editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. After passing this test, the manuscript is forwarded to two reviewers for single-blind peer review, each of whom will make a recommendation to accept, reject, or modify the manuscript. Based on the review report of the reviewer, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The editor must ensure that each manuscript received by the Journal is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc. of the authors.
Authors should present an accurate account of their original research as well as an objective of its significance. Authors must make sure that they have written entirely original work, not submit the same manuscript to another journal concomitantly and also expected that the author will not publish unnecessary manuscripts describing same research in more than one journal. Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite references that have been significant in research work. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors. Sources of financial support, if any, must be clearly acknowledged.
Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. Manuscript should be reviewed in stipulated time. Manuscript reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research properly. Any kind of similarity or overlap between the manuscripts under consideration or with any other published paper must be immediately brought to the editor's notice. Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting point of view.